#Is davinci resolve safe yahooanswers plus
PS: This project will involve 6+ months of flying and shooting plus probably several follow-on projects, so renting isn't really a practical option.ĭo you have any previous experience in filming from an airplane? So, if anyone can point me at any comparison videos that might exist and/or explain how horrible or tolerable switching back and forth between different qualities like this would impact a video, I will appreciate the effort. Plus, presumably I'd also need to find and buy gimbals to eliminate vibration and shake from the more expensive cameras, which would need to be quite huge and expensive gimbals to support such heavy cameras. Unfortunately, I cannot afford 4 or 5 of the high quality video cameras. Obviously my worry is, switching back and forth to video without artifacts (plus superior dynamic range, sharper lens and better sensor) might make the difference blatantly obvious. I get the impression "regular folks" are not much bothered by these compression artifacts, but they drive me NUTS. I have watched a number of 4K 60FPS youtube videos shot with the DJI Osmo Pocket cameras, and while the gimbal makes the videos much more appealing than non-stabilized videos, the smooth motion also makes the compression artifacts much easier to see.
#Is davinci resolve safe yahooanswers pro
#2: If I was to mount a video camera like the Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro 4.6 G2 beneath the airplane (between the main wheels beneath the cabin) and shoot video with that camera too, would a video that switches back and forth between video taken with the low-end video cameras and the high-end video camera be jarring and annoying (and maybe give a worse impression than a video shot with only the low-end video cameras)? #1: Has anyone simultaneously shot videos with two video cameras like these (one high-end and one low-end but both at 4K 60FPS) and posted them somewhere so those of us without both cameras can actually SEE for ourselves how different the videos will look? Given this background, I have to primary questions: However, I have to assume that 4K 60FPS shot with these cameras that record video at only 100Mbps cannot possibly produce results as good as a Blackmagic Ursa Mini Pro 4.6 G2 video camera recording at its best lossless or close-to-lossless setting (even if the lenses and sensors were the same, which they're not). I assume they will need to be inside transparent tubes to keep the constant wind against these tiny video cameras from burning out the gimbals. My current hope is to adopt DJI Osmo Pocket for most or all of these cameras because they are inexpensive ($400 each), shoot 4K at 60FPS, can be controlled with ipad via WIFI from cockpit, and include stabilization. What I am currently trying to figure out is what combination of video cameras to adopt. outside copilot window with copilot and pilot at far left of frame and instrument panel & windshield at far right between head of pilot and copilot pointing forward (instrument panel and through windshield) under body/fuselage in front of tail-wheel pointing forward and slightly downward under right wing pointing forward and outward under left wing pointing forward and outward The current plan is to attach one video camera in each of the following places: The most important goal is to generate rich, detailed, smooth videos. I am in the process of choosing video cameras and tools to create some videos taken from an airplane that can fly low and slow through regions of wild, crazy, awesome geology.